Are employees required to have a probationary period?

By Andrew Emerson, Employee Relations Officer

When offering employment to a new employee, most employers expect that the person selected is not only the best fit for the job but will also become a high performing and long-standing employee.

However, this is not always the case and having a probationary period can be a useful tool to identify potential issues early in the piece.

A probation period is an optional term of employment, during which an employer assesses whether an employee has the necessary skills and experience to perform effectively in the role and business.

Probationary periods are not specified under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) or the Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA).

This means it must be specified in the employment contract. In addition, if an employer is unsure of the employee’s performance or conduct and wishes to extend their probation period, they can only do so if there is an expressed provision for this in the contract of employment.

Depending on the type of role, a probationary period may be for as little as a couple weeks or up to six months or longer.

Under the FW Act, which applies to national system employers and their employees, probationary periods have little weight as a valid reason for dismissal, due to unfair dismissal and general protections provisions.

For example, section 383 of the FW Act requires an employee to serve a minimum employment period before they are eligible to submit an unfair dismissal claim.

This section provides businesses with 15 or more employees protection from unfair dismissal claims during an employee’s first six months of employment, whereas businesses with fewer than 15 employees are protected for the first 12 months of employment.

Extending a probationary period will not subsequently extend the protections provided to employers under the FW Act.

Once the employee has served the relevant minimum employment period, they will be eligible to submit a claim, despite still being on probation.

As there is no minimum employment period for a general protections claim, a probationary period will not prevent an employee from submitting a claim for unlawful dismissal.

Under the IR Act, which applies to state system employers and their employees, there is no minimum employment period for an employee to submit a claim for unfair dismissal.

However, under section 23A(2) of the IR Act, the Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission is required to consider whether, at the time of dismissal, the employee was on probation and employed for less than three months.

This does not provide an automatic protection, but unlike under the FW Act, probationary periods under three months are genuinely considered when determining if a dismissal is unfair.

It is recommended that employers (in both the national and state systems) apply a fair process when managing employees during their probationary periods.

This may include:

both informal and formal notification of poor performance or conduct
providing a right of reply, and in some circumstances, the opportunity to improve
following any relevant policies and procedures.
Employee’s will also be entitled to the minimum period of notice, as prescribed by the relevant industrial instrument, if dismissed during their probationary period.

► Need help with understanding probation periods? Contact CCIWA’s Employee Relations Advice Centre on (08) 9365 7660 or email [email protected].

Share This Post

You may also be interested in

Grants up to $15m for decarbonisation-focused projects
Grants up to $15m for decarbonisation-focused projects
Projects focused on decarbonisation have been given a boost with grants of up to $15 million.
Read more »
Visa program helps WA businesses recruit skilled UK workers 
Visa program helps WA businesses recruit skilled UK workers 
WA businesses can recruit skilled migrants from the United Kingdom without needing sponsorship arrangements and skilled occupation lists.
Read more »
Business achieves progress on ‘nature positive’ changes
Business achieves progress on ‘nature positive’ changes
The Federal Government’s decision to commit to full public consultation for most of its ‘nature positive’ reforms is welcome news to businesses.
Read more »