You have one free articles for this month. Sign up for a CCIWA Membership for unlimited access.

Workers’ compensation – termination

By CCIWA Editor

Terminating the employment relationship

The right to terminate the employment relationship is restricted where the employee has a workers’ compensation claim. An employer is required to hold a position for the employee for a period equivalent to 12 months of incapacity (section 84AA Workers’ Compensation and Injury Management Act 1981). If the employee is certified partially or totally fit for work within that 12 month period the employer must provide:

  • the employee’s pre-injury position if it is reasonably practicable to do so
  • an alternative position that the employee is qualified for and capable of performing and that is most comparable in status and pay to their pre-injury role.

If an employer does terminate the employment relationship within that 12 month timeframe a penalty of $5,000 may apply.

Prescribed form to terminate

Where the employer terminates the employment relationship within the 12 month period, the employer must give 28 days notice to the worker and WorkCover WA before the termination comes into effect. Notice is provided to the worker and WorkCover WA by completing the prescribed form.

Form 15G is available on the WorkCover website at www.workcover.wa.gov.au. If the employer terminates the employment relationship and fails to send the notice in the manner described, there is a penalty of $2,000.

The effect of termination on the workers’ compensation claim

Terminating the employment relationship of an employee with an active workers’ compensation claim is likely to affect the ongoing management of the claim. If the employee is not yet certified by the treating medical practitioner as fit for work, you will need to continue paying ongoing weekly compensation.

The employee will usually be entitled to the full rate of weekly compensation and not a rate that has been reduced because the employee was participating on a return to work program.

The insurer will be required to assume your role in returning the employee to work. The insurance company will do this by appointing an accredited vocational rehabilitation provider to find alternative duties outside your workplace. The cost of vocational rehabilitation and the time required to achieve a return to work outcome will vary depending on the nature of the injury, the stage of the recovery and other factors. These costs will be added to the cost of the claim and may affect your premium.

Interaction with other legislation

In addition to meeting the above obligations, employers must ensure they also comply with termination provisions under other applicable state or federal legislation. Such legislation includes but is not limited to:

  • Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – unlawful termination and/or unfair dismissal
  • Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth)
  • Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (WA)
  • Industrial Relations Act 1979 (WA) – unfair dismissal.

Further Information

CCI’s Employment Relations Advice Centre has developed articles addressing matters pertaining to worker’s compensation and termination, including:

  • Workers’ Compensation and Injury Management
  • Unfair Dismissals
  • General Protections – National System Employers.

For assistance and advice please contact the CCI Safety and Risk Services team on (08) 9365 7415 or email [email protected].

Terminating the employment relationship

You may also be interested in

Privacy Act changes explained
Privacy Act changes explained
A proposed overhaul of the Federal Privacy Act would represent a major shift in how organisations collect, use and manage data. We explain how this...
Read more »
Pulse Check: redundancy – your questions answered
Pulse Check: redundancy – your questions answered
What are your obligations as an employer around redundancy? Our experts answer your FAQs.
Read more »
Case Study –   Skei Batton v The Environment Centre NT
Case Study –   Skei Batton v The Environment Centre NT
The Fair Work Commission (FWC) handed down a decision in an unfair dismissal claim involving an employee and serious misconduct.
Read more »